Neil J. Smelser
Harvard College, B.A., Social Relations, 1952
Oxford University, Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, B.A. 1954; M.A. 1959
Harvard University, Ph.D., 1958.
San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, 1971
Neil Smelser is a Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. He grew up in Phoenix, Arizona, during the 1930s and 1940s as the middle child in a family of three boys. After his time at Oxford, at the age of 26 he co-authored Economy and Society with Talcott Parsons, a renowned American sociologist. He is a former president of the American Sociological Association. He was also the Director of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford from 1994 to 2001. Professor Smelser is the author of over a dozen books, including The Theory of Collective Behavior. His most current publication is The Odyssey Experience: Physical, Social, Psychological, and Spiritual Journeys. It is a “very general study of taking leave from your daily circumstances and getting involved in something special.” Travel continues to remain an important aspect of his life ever since he he hitchhiked all over Europe in his youth.
In which town in Missouri were you born?
Kahoka. A small town in Clark County in the northeastern corner, very close to Iowa, Illinois, and the Mississippi River.
How would you describe your parents’ parenting style?
Background. They were both children of farm families in Missouri. They were the only ones in each of their families that went away and received a college education. They were people who were on their own ambitious. They met at college, got married, and moved to Phoenix about the time I was born.
My mother was a kindly, patient, very independent woman who was very dedicated to her sons. I would have to call her a very attentive mother, even though in our younger years she worked part-time as a substitute teacher. When we were in adolescence, she resumed her interest in teaching and became a full-time teacher first at the elementary school level and then at the high school level teaching Latin and English. I wouldn’t call her an effusive person. She was very self-sufficient and she wasn’t highly emotional. Even though I’ve always felt her to be a warm, supportive, and loving person, her style was not in any way out of control, or extra-emotional.
My father was in many respects a more emotional man. He was prone to expressing emotions, both positive and negative. He was more the final authority in the family when it came to discipline. He was the law. He wasn’t the exclusive disciplinarian, but more inclined than my mother. I always remember my father as having a stern side to his life. At the same time, I never doubted how much he loved his sons. He was always supportive of us in anything we did. I once told him when I was in fourth grade of a question that the homeroom teacher had asked of the class. She asked what is it about your parents that you like most of all. I remember giving the answer that I appreciated most of all the independence my parents extended to me and I felt I had the freedom to become what I wanted to be. I came home from school on that very day and told my parents what I had said. They were obviously very moved and very positive. This rang a really wonderful bell with them.


Barnaby Marsh
Carolyn Conner Seepersad







